Suchergebnisse

The subject. An attempt is made to analyze the evolution of the relationship between the Russian Presidents and local self-government in modern Russia over the past 30 years.The methodology of the research is based on the application of the historical method and the method of comparative legal analysis of normative legal acts of the Russian Federation of different years.The purpose of the article is to confirm or dispute hypothesis that the President's relations with local self-government developed non-linearly and contradictory on the different stages.The main results, scope of application. The paper examines the dynamics of the relationship between the Russian Presidents and local self-government, determines the five stages of the development of such relations and their characteristic features, as well as the prospects for these relations after the adoption of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 2020.Stage 1. The absence of specific regulatory legal provisions on the participation of the President in local self-government issues and the actual practice of their interaction (July 1991 – October 1993).Stage 2. Arbitrary or authoritarian President's participation in local self-government issues (October 1993 – August 1995). This stage is connected with the period of the constitutional crisis of 1993 and is characterized, first of all, by two decrees of the Russian President directly changing the provisions of the Law of the Russian Federation on Local Self-Government of 1991.Stage 3. Bringing the powers of the President in the field of local self-government in accordance with the Russian Constitution of 1993, the approval by the President of the main directions of state policy in the field of local self – government development in the Russian Federation, the creation of the Council for Local Self-Government under the President of the Russian Federation (August 1995 – August 2000).Stage 4. Strengthening the role of the President in the field of local self-government. The beginning of this stage is connected with the coming to power of the new Russian President (August 2000 – July 2020). So far, this is the longest stage in our chronology. This stage is characterized by additional regulation by the President of certain point issues in the field of organization and implementation of local self-government, directly provided for by federal law. Stage 5. The integration of local self-government bodies into a single system of public power and the receipt by the Russian President of hidden, virtually unlimited powers in the field of local self-government (from July 2020 to the present). The starting point of this stage was the adoption of amendments to the Russian Constitution in 2020.Conclusions. The interaction between the Russian President and local self-government developed in a zigzag pattern: from the complete absence of contacts to the direct intervention of the Russian President in the legal regulation of relations in the field of local self– government, violating and actually canceling the legislative regulation of these relations in 1993-1995. From bringing these relations into line with the Russian Constitution of 1993, which proclaimed the organizational independence of local self-government, to strengthening the role of the Russian President and regulating certain issues in the field of organization and implementation of local self-government. The expansion of the powers of the Russian President in connection with the amendments to the Russian Constitution in 2020 actually means an aside from the organizational independence of local self-government and the integration of local self-government bodies into a single system of public authorities. In this regard, the question arises: do the above amendments mean an actual return to the second stage of the development of relations between the Russian President and local selfgovernment in the period of 1993-1995, when the use of "hidden (implied)" powers of the President was allowed, and, consequently, theoretically unlimited participation of the Russian President in local self-government issues? ; На основе применения исторического метода и метода сравнительно-правового анализа нормативных правовых актов Российской Федерации разных лет сделана попытка исследования эволюции взаимоотношений Президента РФ и местного самоуправления в современной России за последние 30 лет. Определены пять этапов развития взаимоотношений Президента РФ и местного самоуправления, их характерные черты, а также перспективы после принятия поправок к Конституции РФ 2020 г. Сделаны выводы о том, что взаимодействие Президента РФ и местного самоуправления развивалось зигзагообразно. Расширение полномочий Президента РФ в связи с поправками к Конституции РФ 2020 г. фактически означает отход от организационной самостоятельности местного самоуправления и встраивание органов местного самоуправления в единую систему публичной власти.

The subject of the paper is civil servants' right on pension provision and realization of this right in Russian regions.The purpose of the paper is to check the constitutionality and legality of limits to this right. Some limits were imposed by the court practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Fe- deration.The methodology. General scientific methods as analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison were used. The authors also use the formal legal interpretation of judicial decisions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, concerning pension rights of public servants.The main results and scope of their application. The principle of budget balance is very relevant for the Russian Federation and is crucial in the system of public administration. But different courts' approaches to the protection of the rights of citizens depending on their official position and social affiliation means a violation of the constitutional principle of equality of rights, infringe the rights of civil servants to state pension provision. The results of research may be used as the basis of correction of judicial practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and legislation concerning pension rights of public servants.Conclusions. Deprivation of rights to receive a pension when there is an absence of the region's necessary budget funds leads to unjustified differences in the implementation of this right in relation to civil servants in certain regions of the Russian Federation. The con-stitutional principle of equality of citizens' rights should always be taken into account by the courts when considering the most important cases related to the establishment of social support measures for certain categories of citizens. ; Устанавливается конституционность и законность условий реализации права на пен-сионное обеспечение государственных гражданских служащих субъектов Российской Федерации. Делается вывод, что лишение гражданских служащих субъекта федера-ции права на получение пенсии за выслугу лет в случае отсутствия у региона необхо-димых собственных денежных средств приводит к необоснованным различиям в ре-ализации данного права гражданскими служащими в отдельных субъектах Россий-ской Федерации.